acthub.beta
EnactedRoyal Assentc. 6

Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023

Bill 3167Commons originatingintroduced 25 May 2022
This bill became lawView the statute on acthub →c. 6 · 23 Mar 2023

Bill texts 6

  • Bill 011 2022-23 (as introduced)Bill · 25 May 2022download soon
  • Bill 011 2022-23 (as introduced) - large printBill · 25 May 2022download soon
  • HL Bill 64 (as introduced)Bill · 01 Nov 2022 · 2 files · 1.7 MBdownload soon
  • HL Bill 83 (as amended in Committee)Bill · 14 Dec 2022 · 2 files · 1.5 MBdownload soon
  • HL Bill 95 (as amended on Report)Bill · 25 Jan 2023 · 2 files · 1.7 MBdownload soon
  • Bill 242 2022-23 (Lords Amendments to the Bill)Bill · 02 Feb 2023download soon

Amendments 80

Committee stage — Commons 20

NegativedOnDivisionClause 26EditBillBody

Clause 26, page 16, line 29, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002440
NotCalledClause 26EditBillBody

Clause 26, page 16, line 31, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002441
WithdrawnClause 27EditBillBody

Clause 27, page 18, line 16, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002442
NotCalledClause 27EditBillBody

Clause 27, page 18, line 20, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002443
NotCalledClause 27EditBillBody

Clause 27, page 18, line 26, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002444
WithdrawnClause 43EditBillBody

Clause 43, page 28, line 6, at end insert— “(7) Regulations under this Act must be made in accordance with—

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002445
NegativedOnDivisionClause 43EditBillBody

Clause 43, page 28, line 6, at end insert— “(7) No regulations may be made under this Act unless—

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002446
WithdrawnClause 48EditBillBody

Clause 48, page 30, line 18, at end insert— “(3A) Regulations under subsection (3)(b) may not appoint a day on which any of sections 11 to 15 is to come into force unless the welfare advisory body has advised the Secretary of State that it is satisfied that regulations made under Part 2 establish a proper process to ensure that the health and welfare of animals, and their qualifying progeny, in respect of which a precision bred animal marketing authorisation is made will not be adversely affected by any precision bred trait.”

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002447
NegativedOnDivisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Labelling

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002448
NegativedOnDivisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Release and marketing of precision bred animals

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002449
NegativedOnDivisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Genetic Technology Authority

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002450
NotCalledAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Accounts and audit

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002451
NotCalledAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Reports to Secretary of State

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002452
NotCalledAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “General functions of the Authority

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002453
NotCalledAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Duties in relation to carrying out its functions

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002454
NotCalledAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Power to delegate and establish committees

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Kerry McCarthy#10002455
WithdrawnClause 48EditBillBody

Clause 48, page 30, line 20, at end insert— “(5A) Regulations may not be made under or by virtue of this section unless a common framework agreement relating to the release and marketing of, and risk assessments relating to, precision bred plants and animals, and the marketing of food and feed produced from such plants and animals, has been agreed between a Minister of the Crown, the Scottish Government and the Welsh Government.

Moved: Deidre Brock#10002465
NotCalledAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Power of the Scottish Parliament to legislate on the marketing of precision bred organisms

Moved: Deidre Brock#10002466
NotCalledAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Labelling of food or feed produced by precision bred animals

Moved: Deidre Brock#10002467
NotSelectedAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Intellectual property

Moved: Daniel ZeichnerSponsor: Jim McMahon, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon#10002469

Report stage — Commons 20

NoDecisionClause 1DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out “or a precision bred animal”

Moved: Caroline LucasSponsor: Clive Lewis#10001149
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “The Genetic Technology Authority

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas#10001637
NoDecisionClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 3, line 35, at end insert— “(c) the organism has been developed for or in connection with one or more of the following purposes—

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas#10001638
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Duties in relation to carrying out its functions

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas#10001639
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Reports to Secretary of State

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas#10001640
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Accounts and audit

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas#10001641
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “General functions of the Authority

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas#10001642
NoDecisionClause 13EditBillBody

Clause 13, page 9, line 20, at end insert— “(za) that the precision bred traits will not have a direct or indirect adverse effect on the health or welfare of the relevant animal or its qualifying progeny,

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas, Clive Lewis#10001643
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Power to delegate and establish committees

Moved: Jim McMahonSponsor: Daniel Zeichner, Ruth Jones, Alex Sobel, Mary Glindon, Caroline Lucas#10001645
NoDecisionClause 26EditBillBody

Clause 26, page 16, line 36, after “traceability”, insert “through supply chain auditing”

Moved: Caroline Lucas#10002361
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Labelling of food or feed produced by precision bred organisms

Moved: Caroline Lucas#10002362
NoDecisionClause 26EditBillBody

Clause 26, page 17, line 1, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Caroline Lucas#10002363
NoDecisionClause 26EditBillBody

Clause 26, page 16, line 31, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Caroline Lucas#10002364
NoDecisionClause 26EditBillBody

Clause 26, page 16, line 29, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Caroline LucasSponsor: Clive Lewis#10002365
NoDecisionClause 26EditBillBody

Clause 26, page 17, line 4, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Moved: Caroline Lucas#10002366
NoDecisionClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 1, line 14, at end insert— “(2A) But for the purposes of this Act an organism is not “precision bred” if any feature of its genome results from any technique or process which involves the insertion of exogenous genetic material, whether or not such material is subsequently removed.”

Moved: Caroline Lucas#10002368
NoDecisionClause 13EditBillBody

Clause 13, page 9, line 20, at end insert— “(za) that the scientific evidence does not indicate that the precision bred traits are likely to have a direct or indirect adverse effect on the health or welfare of the relevant animal or its qualifying progeny, and if so”

Moved: Sir Roger GaleSponsor: Clive Lewis#10002386
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Labelling of food or feed produced by precision bred animals

Moved: Deidre Brock#10002653
NoDecisionAddClauseOrSchedule

To move the following Clause— “Power of the Scottish Parliament to legislate on the marketing of precision bred organisms

Moved: Deidre Brock#10002655
NoDecisionClause 25EditBillBody

Clause 25, page 16, line 24, at end insert— “(1A) In making regulations under this section the Secretary of State must consider and evaluate (among other things) the possible direct or indirect adverse impact of precision breeding traits on the—

Moved: Henry Smith#10002661

Committee stage — Lords 20

WithdrawnClause 4EditBillBody

Clause 4, page 4, line 24, leave out “negative” and insert “affirmative”

Moved: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003532
NotMovedClause 9DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 9, page 7, line 1, leave out paragraph (a)

Moved: Baroness Hayman of UllockSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003537
NotMovedClause 5DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 5, page 5, leave out lines 9 to 11

Moved: Baroness Hayman of UllockSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003541
NotMovedClause 11EditBillBody

Clause 11, page 8, line 25, leave out “negative” and insert “affirmative”

Moved: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003548
StoodPartClause 11DeleteClauseOrSchedule

<i>The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 11 stand part of the Bill.</i>

Moved: Baroness Hayman of UllockSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003549
NotMovedClause 5DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 5, page 5, line 12, leave out subsection (5)

Moved: Baroness Hayman of UllockSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003555
NotMovedClause 5DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 5, page 4, line 33, leave out paragraph (b)

Moved: Baroness Hayman of UllockSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003557
StoodPartClause 10DeleteClauseOrSchedule

<i>The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 10 stand part of the Bill.</i>

Moved: Baroness Hayman of UllockSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10003564
NotMovedClause 12EditBillBody

Clause 12, page 8, line 38, after second “risks” insert “, including the potential quality of life on a farm or in a home for future generations of a relevant animal”

Moved: Lord Cameron of Dillington#10003646
NotMovedClause 12EditBillBody

Clause 12, page 8, line 28, at end insert— “(1A) The welfare advisory body must carry out an assessment of the likely impact of the precision bred traits on the health and welfare of the relevant animal and its qualifying progeny.

Moved: Baroness Hayman of Ullock#10003659
NotMovedClause 6DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 6, page 5, line 20, leave out subsection (2)

Moved: Lord Rooker#10003663
NotMovedClause 12EditBillBody

Clause 12, page 8, line 40, at end insert— “(2A) Where the purpose of the application of a precision bred trait includes—

Moved: Baroness Hayman of Ullock#10003664
WithdrawnClause 4DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 4, page 4, line 16, leave out subsection (3)

Moved: Lord Rooker#10003665
NotMovedClause 7EditBillBody

Clause 7, page 6, line 8, at end insert— “(4A) Information requested by the advisory committee may include, in cases where the precision bred organism is likely to be used for the purposes of agriculture, an assessment of the likely changes to agricultural processes arising from the use of that organism.”

Moved: Baroness Jones of WhitchurchSponsor: Lord Krebs#10003686
NotMovedClause 4EditBillBody

Clause 4, page 4, line 10, at end insert— “(ia) in relation to precision bred animals, a written undertaking to use best endeavours to keep a continuing record of clinical outcomes, and adverse effects and outcomes, of the precision bred animals and their qualifying progeny, and to supply such records and other required information to the Secretary of State, and”

Moved: Baroness ParminterSponsor: Baroness Hayman of Ullock#10003690
NotMovedClause 12EditBillBody

Clause 12, page 8, line 40, at end insert— “(d) whether scientific research or practical experience with other animals that have similar traits indicates that risks, other than those identified by the notifier, could reasonably be expected to result from the precision bred traits to the health or welfare of the animal or its qualifying progeny.”

Moved: Baroness ParminterSponsor: Baroness Hayman of Ullock#10003694
WithdrawnClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 3, line 35, at end insert— <span class="wrapped">“and unless the organism appears to be phenotypically healthy and has no defect likely to cause suffering.”</span>

Moved: Lord Winston#10003761
NotMovedClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 3, line 35, at end insert— “(1A) A precision bred animal may not be released in England unless the application of modern biotechnology that resulted in changes to its genome (see section 1(2)) was conducted in a registered dedicated laboratory with an appropriately controlled environment and supervised by an experienced reproductive scientist qualified to undertake such work so that there was no risk of infection with micro-organisms or the possibility of stray DNA, particularly human DNA, contaminating the process specified.”

Moved: Lord Winston#10003763
NotMovedClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 3, line 35, at end insert— “(1A) A precision bred animal that is a vertebrate may not be released in England unless—

Moved: Lord Winston#10003764
NotMovedClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 3, line 35, at end insert— <span class="wrapped">“and unless the organism’s genome has been sequenced, the features of its genome that have resulted from the application of modern biotechnology (see section 1(2)(a)) have been recorded, there have been no changes in the genome other than those predicted, and this has been reported to the Secretary of State.”</span>

Moved: Lord Winston#10003766

Report stage — Lords 20

NotMovedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 1, line 11, after “could” insert “in principle”

Moved: Lord Krebs#10004289
AgreedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 1, line 11, leave out from “genome” to end of line 14 and insert “that results from the application of modern biotechnology could have resulted from traditional processes, whether or not in conjunction with selection techniques, alone,”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004299
AgreedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 1, line 14, at end insert “and (d) its genome does not contain any feature that results from the application of any artificial modification technique other than modern biotechnology.”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004300
NotMovedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 2, line 5, leave out “functional protein” and insert “change in the phenotype”

Moved: Lord Krebs#10004301
NotMovedClause 12EditBillBody

Clause 12, page 8, line 30, at end insert— “(za) whether the welfare advisory body is satisfied that the notifier has a record of acting in a manner which is consistent with the requirements applicable to the notifier which are laid out in —

Moved: Baroness Jones of WhitchurchSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville, Lord Cameron of Dillington#10004302
AgreedClause 6EditBillBody

Clause 6, page 5, line 31, leave out “negative” and insert “affirmative”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004305
AgreedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 2, line 26, leave out “an organism is” and insert “genes or other genetic material are”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004306
AgreedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 2, line 25, at end insert— “(7A) An “artificial modification technique” means any technique by which genes or other genetic material can be artificially modified within the meaning of Part 6 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (as it has effect from time to time).”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004309
NotMovedClause 12EditBillBody

Clause 12, page 8, line 39, after “paragraphs” insert “(za),”

Moved: Baroness Jones of WhitchurchSponsor: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville#10004310
AgreedClause 4EditBillBody

Clause 4, page 4, line 24, at end insert— “(7) Regulations under subsection (3) are subject to the affirmative procedure.”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004311
AgreedClause 4EditBillBody

Clause 4, page 4, line 24, leave out “this section” and insert “subsection (1)(b)”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004312
AgreedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 2, line 35, at end insert— “(10) An organism to which subsection (11) applies does not fail to be precision bred merely because it does not meet the condition in subsection (2)(d).

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004316
DisagreedClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 3, line 24, after “unless” insert “, in relation to a precision bred animal, the date condition in section (<i>Entry into force of provisions relating to animals</i>) has been met, and unless”

Moved: Baroness Hayman of UllockSponsor: Baroness Parminter#10004317
AgreedClause 1DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 1, page 2, line 3, leave out subsection (6)

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004396
NotMovedClause 1EditBillBody

Clause 1, page 1, line 5, at end insert “used for food production”

Moved: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle#10004403
WithdrawnClause 1DeleteClauseOrSchedule

Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out “or a precision bred animal”

Moved: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle#10004404
NotMovedClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 4, line 4, at end insert— “(4) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”

Moved: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle#10004406
WithdrawnClause 3EditBillBody

Clause 3, page 3, line 30, at end insert— “(iv) the details of the gene editing event, and the record of the whole genome sequence of the qualifying organism, are recorded in a publicly available register established by regulations,”

Moved: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle#10004407
AgreedClause 11EditBillBody

Clause 11, page 8, line 24, at end insert— “(9A) Regulations under subsection (5) are subject to the affirmative procedure.”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004431
AgreedClause 11EditBillBody

Clause 11, page 8, line 25, leave out “this section” and insert “subsection (9)”

Moved: Lord Benyon#10004432